Module 10 - Reflective Log



Go to p. 186 of your text and complete the exercise in the textbox titled, "How Good Is Good Enough?" Be sure to follow all instructions in this textbox.

Think of two recent occasions when you were disappointed by how your efforts turned out by misestimating how much on your part was necessary to achieve your goals. Use your critical thinking skills to make a reasoned judgement regarding how to adjust your sense of “good enough” to increase your likelihood of success in the same endeavors the next time.  

Module 10 - Discussion



Discussion
Go to p. 224 in your text and read the textbox titled, "Thinking Critically: Deciding Whether or Not a Man Should Die."
In December 2005, Arnold Schwarzenegger, then Governor of California, was faced with a difficult decision. Should he grant clemency to a high-profile inmate on death row, Mr. Stanley 'Tookie' Williams? The death penalty, as a social policy, had come under considerable criticism. Many well-known Californians called for Governor Schwarzenegger to commute Mr. Williams' sentence to life without possibility of parole. Many Californians believed that Mr. Williams had demonstrated for several years that he was a 'changed man.' As a convicted murderer he deserved life in prison, but he was not the same person he had been decades earlier and he did not, in their view, deserve at this time to be punished with death. Some saw him as a symbol of why the death penalty should be abolished. After deliberating on the matter, Governor Schwarzenegger decided against clemency. Mr. Williams was executed. The Governor posted a document on the Internet describing his decision process.
Read Governor Schwarzenegger's decision at:
Review the map of the Governor's decision on pp. 310-311. Answer the following questions:
Do you agree or disagree with Governor Schwarzenegger's decision?
Exactly what part of his reasoning is most important to you?
Why?

Module 6 - Reflective Log

YOUR FAVORITE NUTRITIONAL SUPPLEMENT

The ads and testimonials for nutritional supplements are among the most effective marketing tools ever, as is supported by the unprecedented growth in the sales of energy drinks, dietary supplements, vitamin beverages, and stimulants. Select for this exercise one of these products you are already purchasing for your own use or any product of this kind that interests you. Use information provided on the product label and from the product's Web site as needed to respond to these questions in your log:

1. What claims are made about the benefits of the product?
2. What research is cited or what evidence is supplied to support the truth of these claims?
3. Who are the people who have provided testimonials in support of the product?
4. What level of expertise do these individuals have with regard to human nutrition?
5. Were any of these individuals paid to provide their endorsement?
6. What warnings, risks, or potentially harmful side effects are presented?
7. What ingredients does the supplement contain?
8. Biologically and nutritionally, what does each ingredient do? In other words, what is its function?
9. Is the supplement 'specially formulated' in any way that is purported to enhance its efficacy?
10. Who are the target consumers of the supplement? Who should use it?
11. What have you been told about the supplement by friends, coaches, and salespeople?
12. Who produces/manufactures the supplement? What is that producer's reputation?
13. Is the supplement approved as 'safe and effective' by the federal Food and Drug Administration?
14. In terms of the nutritional benefits and risks, how does the supplement compare to the items on this list: orange juice, milk, coffee, standard multivitamin tablets, carrots, apples, broccoli, ordinary yogurt, cottage cheese, peanut butter, tuna fish, baked turkey breast, and wheat bread?
15. Reflect on your answers to questions 2-14 and then evaluate the claims you wrote down in #1. Are they true, plausible, implausible, or untrue, or should you suspend judgment about those claims?

Module 9 - Review



1.
"When I turn on the radio, my dishwasher stops working." What would you have to add to this to make it an example of the False Clause Fallacy?
A) I like listening to loud music vs. soft music.
B) It must be that the radio somehow affects the dishwasher.
C) I should call the dishwasher repairman.
D) I hate it when I can't get my dishwasher to work.
Correct Answer(s):          B

2.
Which of the following statements about generalizations is true?
A) They are always accurate and unbiased.
B) They are always based on systematically gathered data.
C) They can be deceptively fallacious.
D) They are most accurate when based on personal observations.
Correct Answer(s):          C

3.
"I always wear my lucky necklace. Even though I don't always have a good day when I wear it, if I don't, I just know I'll have a bad day." This is an example of which of the following?
A) Dilemma Fallacy
B) Gambler's Fallacy
C) Constructive Fallacy
D) Aesthetic Fallacy
Correct Answer(s):          B

4.
"If you skip a class in college..." How would you finish this sentence to make it an example of the Slippery Slope Fallacy?
A) you should ask a classmate for the notes.
B) you must attend the exam.
C) you will never finish your degree.
D) you can't drop it after a certain date.
Correct Answer(s):          C

5.
Karl is notorious for playing with numbers when presenting information to his colleagues. Which of the following would he be most likely to say?
A) A total of 50% of all Americans own a home. That means half of all Americans own a home.
B) The box says 8 out of 10 doctors approve it. That means 80% of all doctors approve it.
C) Nine out of 10 of our colleagues who were polled approve of the new human resources policies.
D) The average male makes 20% more than the average female in the same job. That means men are paid more than women.
Correct Answer(s):          B

6.
Each time Gary eats peanuts, his face swells. This is an example of a
A) coincidental event.
B) chance occurrence.
C) biological illusion.
D) causal relationship.
Correct Answer(s):          D

7.
Which of the following statements about evaluating generalizations is true?
A) To evaluate generalizations, one must examine if the sampling of cases is adequate to support the inferences drawn.
B) To evaluate generalizations, the only thing that needs to be done is to find a counterexample.
C) When evaluating generalizations, assume that they are correct if they are stated by your superior.
D) When evaluating generalizations, you only need to ask two key questions to find out if they are accurate.
Correct Answer(s):          A

8.
Patricia often falls victim to the Gambler's Fallacy. Which of the following things would she be most likely to say?
A) Random events do not correlate.
B) Random events are never connected.
C) Random events are typically planned.
D) Random events can be causally connected.
Correct Answer(s):          D

9.
At the same moment Jim was in a car crash, his wife Linda was struck by lightning. This is an example of a(n)
A) incident.
B) cause.
C) accident.
D) coincidence.
Correct Answer(s):          D
10.
What is the definition of a coincidence?
A) one event following another event
B) two planned events happening at the same time
C) two events happening together by chance
D) one event happening a week before another
Correct Answer(s):          C

11.
"Gambler's Fallacy" helps us remember that
A) random events are not correlated.
B) random events can be causally related.
C) random events should never be trusted.
D) random events rarely occur.
Correct Answer(s):          A

12.
Karl is a strong critical thinker. He explains to his friend that a fallacy of division is one that typically falls under the category of
A) mathematical fallacies that pervade society.
B) fallacies that can sometimes be truthful, depending on the context.
C) fallacies masquerading as valid deductive arguments.
D) arbitrary fallacies that call for further investigation.
Correct Answer(s):          C

13.
What do correlations describe?
A) the amount of chance needed for something to occur
B) the relationship between stereotypes and outcomes
C) the degree to which two different sets of events are aligned
D) the power of critical thinking in various circumstances
Correct Answer(s):          C

14.
What is the definition of an inductively justified argument?
A) an argument such that if all of its premises were false, then its conclusion would most likely be true
B) an argument such that if all of its premises were true, then its conclusion would most likely be false
C) an argument such that if all of its premises were true, then its conclusion would most likely be true
D) an argument such that if all of its premises were false, then its conclusion would most likely be false
Correct Answer(s):          C

15.
Marise is teaching a critical thinking course. She explains to her class that ________ is a type of argument that fails the test of relevance.
A) an appeal to the mob
B) a numbers modification
C) a steep slope
D) a truthful fallacy
Correct Answer(s):          A
 
16.
Which of the following statements about documenting a causal relationship is true?
A) Documenting a causal relationship is important and intellectually challenging work.
B) Documenting a causal relationship simply involves demonstrating a correlation between two events.
C) Documenting a causal relationship is not useful, because it can't help us predict future events.
D) Documenting a causal relationship is the most difficult task in the field of critical thinking.
Correct Answer(s):          A

17.
Right after I ate a strawberry, my mom called. My eating the strawberry must have caused my mom to call. This is an example of
A) post haste reasoning.
B) post action reaction.
C) post hoc, propter hoc.
D) post consumption fallacy.
Correct Answer(s):          C

18.
Inductive reasoning depends on the
A) evidence at hand.
B) original claim.
C) final conclusion.
D) facts put forth.
Correct Answer(s):          A

 19.
Elise pays a lot of attention to coincidences. Which of the following is an example of something she would say?
A) Every time I answer the door, a cold draft enters the house. These two events are connected.
B) When I meet new people, I make sure to always create a rhyme to remember their name.
C) As soon as I called my friend, she dialed me. My calling her must have caused her to call me.
D) I didn't receive my allowance this week, so I won't be able to go to the movies this weekend.
Correct Answer(s):          C

20.
Crystal is teaching a critical thinking class. Which of the following would she give her class as an example of erroneous generalization?
A) Only female students drop my course after the first day. So, my course must be too difficult for female students.
B) A female student dropped my course. The next day her car was broken into. It must have been the result of dropping my course.
C) Female students drop my course most frequently. I sign more drop slips from female students than from male students.
D) Whenever I assign homework, at least one female student drops my course. I should assign more homework.
Correct Answer(s):          A

Module 9 Reflective Log



Complete the reflective log assignment titled, "To Kill a Mockingbird" in the textbox at the top of p. 177. Be sure to follow the instructions provided in the textbox. 
Use this link to access the video:
Gregory Peck plays the defense attorney Atticus Finch in the film To Kill a Mockingbird. The story is about a young man accused of rape. In this clip, Atticus Finch is giving his summation to the jury. He must be careful not to alienate the members of the jury, whom he regards as potentially biased against the defendant. Atticus first argues that the prosecution has not proved that a crime was actually committed. He then claims that the accused, Tom Robinson, could not physically have done the things that the prosecution claims. Atticus, believing that he must do more than make claims and logical arguments establishing reasonable doubt, then addresses a key question. Why would the accuser have lied about being raped by the accused? Atticus says he has pity for the victim and then he argues that by accusing Tom Robinson, she was attempting to rid herself of her own guilt. The defense then attempts to challenge the prejudicial assumption: All Negros are to be distrusted. Watch scene 28, "The Broken Code" (time code 1:31:40 to 1:38:55). Listen carefully to the claims and arguments made by Atticus Finch. Transcribe them, use the techniques in Chapter 5 to analyze and map them, and, using what you learned in Chapters 7 and 8, evaluate them. Explain your analysis and your evaluation. Would you have made the summation differently? If so, how?

Module 9 – Discussion



Fallacies such as the slippery slope, playing with numbers, and the false dilemma are often used by advertisers to influence viewers' attitudes. Review advertisements on television, online, or in magazines and identify an instance of one of the fallacies discussed in the chapter. Post the fallacy, how it occurred, and in what context. Where possible, provide a reference so that others may view your source. When you have done this, review your classmates' posts. Reply to the post that you believe contains the most blatant fallacy.