Showing posts with label Module 07. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Module 07. Show all posts

Module 7 - Review



1.
Angie frequently makes ad hominem attacks. What is true about Angie's claims?
A) They assume the person involved has a flaw of some sort.
B) The opposite of her claims is always true, especially when they involve an expert.
C) Her claims do not need to be debunked; they should be believed.
D) They are always based in critical thought and logical reasoning.
Correct Answer(s):          A

2.
Which of the following is the best description of circularity?
A) when a claim is being relied on as a part of a chain of reasoning to support its own reason
B) when an expert is conflicted in his or her thinking about a particular issue
C) when an argument is rational and cannot possibly be debunked by the experts
D) when an claim has so many reasons that one must go through all of them to confirm its validity
Correct Answer(s):          A

3.
Martin often relies on stereotypes and ambiguity when supporting his claims. This is an example of a
A) straw man fallacy.
B) constructing arguments fallacy.
C) playing with words fallacy.
D) constructive criticism fallacy.
Correct Answer(s):          C

4.
What is the first test of an argument's worthiness?
A) test of tautological analytical reasoning
B) test of overall strength of logic
C) test of application of circular reasoning
D) test of truthfulness of the premises
Correct Answer(s):          D

5.
Which of the reasons given below is most similar in style to this one: "Everybody thinks the blue jerseys look better than the green ones."
A) If you choose the green jerseys, people will stop coming to your games.
B) Baseball tickets are more expensive than basketball tickets.
C) It's widely known that most people prefer Coke over Pepsi.
D) Don't believe anything Marcus says because he's a liar.
Correct Answer(s):          C

6.
Which of the following statements about rote memorization is true?
A) It is not a valuable skill.
B) It is not a critical thinking skill.
C) It cannot be learned.
D) It doesn't actually have to do with memorizing.
Correct Answer(s):          B

7.
Elise is teaching a course on critical thinking. Which of the following statements about argument making would she be most likely to say to her class?
A) Making an argument can be used to help one come to a decision.
B) Making an argument must always be confrontational.
C) Making an argument is pointless unless you are an expert.
D) Making an argument is the opposite of truth-seeking.
Correct Answer(s):          A

8.
"Everyone thinks Christmas is the best holiday around. So, this year our office should have a Christmas party instead of a holiday party." This is an example of a
A) office collectivity.
B) critical tautology.
C) bandwagon fallacy.
D) expert opinion.
Correct Answer(s):          C

9.
What is the definition of a fallacy?
A) a deceptive argument that appears logical, but fails to demonstrate its conclusions
B) a sound argument that uses inference and induction, but not reason
C) a tautological argument that uses information by conflicted sources to back it up
D) an unclear argument that must be subjected to rigorous analysis
Correct Answer(s):          A

10.
Marlene thinks her colleague's claim sounds suspicious. As a strong critical thinker, Marlene will
A) reject the claim outright and ignore her colleague's reasons.
B) disprove one of the reasons given in support of the claim.
C) debunk all arguments being advanced in support of the claim.
D) ask her colleague to come up with a different claim.
Correct Answer(s):          C

11.
In the context of this chapter, "sound" is a synonym for
A) tautology.
B) uncomplicated.
C) noise.
D) healthy.
Correct Answer(s):          D

12.
Richard has a driving need to win any debate in which he finds himself. Most likely, Richard's
A) claims are never backed up by reasons.
B) debate opponents are always right.
C) competitive needs override his quest for knowledge.
D) expertise spans all subject areas.
Correct Answer(s):          C

13.
According to the text, "good argument" is a synonym for a
A) expert argument.
B) marked argument.
C) worthy argument.
D) tautological argument.
Correct Answer(s):          C

14.
"Julie is a member of the Anderson family, and they're just a bunch of criminals. Nothing she says should be taken seriously." This is an example of
A) a legal argument.
B) a justifiable statement.
C) an appeal to reason.
D) an ad hominem attack.
Correct Answer(s):          D

15.
Tanya gives two reasons to support her claim. One turns out to be false. As a strong critical thinker, what should you do?
A) Try to come up with a reason to support her claim.
B) Dismiss the second reason because the first was false.
C) Never believe what Tanya says.
D) Test the second reason before dismissing it.
Correct Answer(s):          D

16.
What is the definition of a worthy argument?
A) an argument that merits being accepted as a proof that its conclusion is probably true
B) an argument that is phrased using sophisticated vocabulary and a specific syntax
C) an argument that is devoid of reason or any other extraneous elements
D) an argument given by an expert with a conflict of interest
Correct Answer(s):          A

17.
When evaluating an argument, Jesse uses the four tests. He often does the Test of Relevance before doing the Test of Truthfulness. He should
A) keep doing exactly what he's doing.
B) stop relying on the tests.
C) always do the tests in order.
D) do the Test of Logical Strength first.
Correct Answer(s):          C

18.
Erica does a lot of debating on online forums. One of her favorite techniques is to pick the easiest of her opponent's reasons to refute, thereby refuting the entire claim. This is an example of
A) a reason-based fallacy.
B) a straw man fallacy.
C) a creative fallacy.
D) a critical fallacy.
Correct Answer(s):          B

19.
"But we've always had a company holiday party! Why would we change now?" This is an example of a
A) materialized truth.
B) argument of options.
C) supported reason.
D) fallacy of relevance.
Correct Answer(s):          D

20.
Brad has strong critical thinking skills. One can safely assume that he is good at
A) accepting claims at face value.
B) supporting straw man fallacies.
C) rote memorization.
D) evaluating arguments.
Correct Answer(s):          D

Module 7 - Discussion

Go to p. 144 in your text. Read the textbox titled, "Should DUI Homicide be Prosecuted as Murder?" Watch the clip in its entirety here. [I know this link still works so if the first computer you try doesn’t work please try another]:

 http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=5205158n

Thinking Critically: Should DUI Homicide be prosecuted as Murder? (60 Minutes) A prosecuting attorney in New York is bringing charges of murder against individuals who have killed other people while driving under the influence. The attorney argues that everyone understands that driving while under the influence poses risks for the driver and for other people, including the risk of a fatal accident. The statutes provide for charges of 'depraved indifference' when one's behavior results in the unintended but foreseeable death of another human being. Defense attorneys argue, among other things, that the laws pertaining to murder were never intended to be applied in this way. The debate was captured by CBS's 60 Minutes in a segment that aired on August 2, 2009. Review that segment and map out the reasoning for both sides of this debate. Evaluate the reasoning using the four tests for evaluating arguments. After completing your evaluation, present your own reasoned views on the matter.

Module 7 - Reflective Log

Complete the reflective log exercise on p. 148 of your text titled, "The Ethics of Fallacious Argumentation." REFLECTIVE LOG: THE ETHICS OF FALLACIOUS ARGUMENTATION What if we discovered that we could manipulate the voting public more effectively by the use of fallacious arguments than by the use of worthy arguments? Consider the political impact of the 'death panels' issue described under the Straw Man Fallacy on pages 104-105. The entire episode generated more heat than light. And, yet, it may have achieved its political purpose. Many who heard and believed that the proposed legislation envisioned a eugenics program akin to that advanced by Nazi Germany, showed up at town meetings to vent their anger and voice their objections. If the goal was to delay or derail the Democratic legislative agenda, then the strategy succeeded. This is only one example of using one's skills at argument making to achieve one's goals. Defense attorneys who get juries to acquit criminals is another, as are prosecuting attorneys who get juries to convict innocent people accused of crimes. The ethical question for all critical thinkers is: To what purposes ought I to put my powerful critical thinking skills? This question is analogous to the question: to what purposes ought I to put my college education? These are in part ethical questions and in part questions about one's sense of how to make the meaning of one's life. And what are your answers? Why?